Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

A casino in Jersey City could fight off competition from New York in the Garden State casino market (Image:

Venture capitalist Paul Fireman wants to construct a $4.6 billion casino resort in Jersey City, according to reports by the New Jersey press. State Governor Chris Christie recently declared his openness towards the expansion of casino gaming into North Jersey, and it appears Fireman, who is a previous ceo of reebok and today runs Fireman Capital Partners, is working difficult to make it work well.

The businessman has been ending up in brand New Jersey politicians over the past thirty days to discuss their proposition for a 95-story hotel and casino increasing above New York Harbor that would also feature a motorsports stadium and ‘the largest Ferris wheel in the world.’

Atlantic City, which includes always had the monopoly on casino gaming since the first home opened there in 1978, has lately been in serious economic straits. Despite injections of cash and a five-year intend to rejuvenate the town, spearheaded by Governor Christie in 2011, its casino market failed to bounce back from the recession, because was indeed hoped.

Also, it has been hit hard by new competition from neighboring states such as Pennsylvania, which has superseded brand New Jersey as the second biggest casino market in the usa, after Nevada. Even though Atlantic City casinos like The Showboat and Revel contemplate closure, Christie has apparently been forced to concede that the tactic that is new needed.

Good News for AC?

But definately not hurting Atlantic City, numerous analysts believe an expansion in the north will help the resort that is ailing. The proposed resort in Jersey would sit right across the harbor from Manhattan, and would act as a bastion, protecting brand New Jersey from further competition through the brand new casinos planned for upstate New York, diverting New Yorkers and vacationers away from those casinos, while gathering revenue that could help develop Atlantic City.

State Senate President Stephen Sweeney agrees.

‘This discussion is likely to be had because it has become had, nonetheless it won’t be had at Atlantic City’s expense,’ he said. ‘If anybody thinks that we’m not committed to Atlantic City, they’re crazy. We can not ignore that competition will probably be in ny shortly. But if New Jersey responds by starting a casino in North Jersey, it should happen in a way that will benefit Atlantic City truly. Right now we tax casinos at eight-and-a-half percent. Maybe we set a tax that is new for a casino in the north and a portion of that that’s significant enough to help Atlantic City comes to Atlantic City.’

‘It Will Blow Away Macau’

While casino expansion into North Jersey would require an amendment to the state constitution, Sweeney stated recently he ended up being prepared to allow citizens to vote on such an amendment year that is next. And while details of the proposed development in Jersey City remain few and far between, this indicates that Fireman has convinced some social people in high places currently.

Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop indicated his excitement this week about a ‘world-class facility that features a casino, hotel and meeting center along with the biggest Ferris wheel on the planet all located next to the park that is best in nj (Liberty State Park).’ He added that the project would ‘create 25,000 jobs’ and attract ‘over $5 billion of investment.’

‘It’s huge,’ stated state Senator Raymond Lesniak, who’s got met with Fireman. ‘It has the wow factor … it’s going to blow away Macau as being a destination place for gaming.’

Casinos Seek Conscious Uncoupling from US Dog Rushing

Greyhound dog racing is now only a sideshow at most US tracks, where casino games bring into the profits that are real. The sport in addition has been the main topic of intense criticism. (Image:

In the event that you look around america, you’ll nevertheless see an amount that is fair of race, at least in those states that haven’t made the practice illegal, following massive criticism of several for the problems surrounding the sport. But at many songs, greyhounds are actually raced and then fulfill an obligation that is legal allows the owners to also stage more profitable tasks. And in case the time comes when that motivation to stage dog races goes away, there could be no reason left to possess them at all: something that lots of people would say is a good thing.

The signs of dog racing’s demise have now been seen by industry experts for decades. In 1990, there was nearly $1 billion bet on live dog races in Florida, among the hotbeds that are remaining the competitions. In 2013, that true number had dropped to $258 million. The decline is largely attributed to the spread of casino gambling across the national nation, which gave gamblers and tourists more options for spending their time and money.

Dog Racing Merely a Road to Casino Revenues

Yet those exact same casinos have most likely saved greyhound racing at the time that is same. Many tracks are subsidized by the casinos that are same have actually taken their business away, making it profitable to keep the races going, even as interest in them has waned.

The track owners actually run casinos, slot parlors, or poker rooms themselves in many cases. In these instances, it’s almost always the other business that is profitable; the events are needed as part of licenses that require ‘coupling’ the casino-style games with races.

That’s the situation in Florida, which will be still home to 12 of the 21 American tracks that offer live racing that is greyhound. A great many other tracks do not have their own races anymore, and keep up the part that is racing of bargain only by simulcasting competitions from other tracks.

Owners, Opponents Want Decoupling

This has left racetrack that is many to push for a ‘decoupling’ movement that could end their obligation to perform dog races and just let them focus on the other gambling passions. This has triggered a unusual alliance between track owners and animal rights teams whom think that the events are cruel and that the dogs are mistreated. These teams believe that decoupling will lead to the inevitably end (however slowly) of greyhound racing in america.

In Florida’s newest try to restructure the state’s gaming laws, one proposal to decouple casino gambling from greyhound racing was refused, though it could come straight back the following year. Likewise, West Virginia killed a bill that would have slice the licensing fees and paid down the number that is minimum of days required at certainly one of their state’s two dog racing tracks.

With both owners and opponents on board for decoupling, you might be wondering who is against the change. One response is the horse industry that is racing which believes this kind of movement could sooner or later kill their sport too.

Horse racing is a far more popular and financially viable sport than greyhound racing. However, only the largest tracks are truly profitable, and numerous now run ‘racinos’ with slot machines as well as other games in order to show a profit. If horse racing are not required, some among these tracks could switch up to casino that is pure, shrinking the industry.

Greyhound racing is presently illegal in 39 states, while four others have no songs, despite the possible lack of guidelines prohibiting them. Along side Florida, which has a dozen venues, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Texas and West Virginia each host one or two dog racing tracks.

As Portuguese Economy Tumbles, RGA Chides Online Tax Hikes

The Remote Gambling Association has reacted to new Portuguese online sports betting operator taxes, even as Portugual continues to face crisis that is economic. (Image:

Even as Portuguese banking shares tumbled this week, sending fear throughout the EU bank operating system, the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), the largest Web gaming trade association on the planet, has slammed Portugal’s draft gambling bill, branding its tax rates as ‘unworkable’ and urged regulators to think once more. The punitive 8 to 16 per cent tax on activities stakes that are betting make the market ‘unviable’ for online operators, it states.

The bill is currently winging its method through the Portuguese parliamentary system, with the federal government anxious to regulate asap as element of a wide-ranging recovery plan that is economic. Portugal was once bailed away from a crisis that is financial 2011 by the EU Commission, the European Central Bank and Global Monetary Fund in a €78 billion ($106.14 billion) rescue program. It exited the program in might and now faces pressure that is increasing bolster its still-embattled economy.

Secretary of State Adolfo Mesquita Nunes announced recently that taxation revenues from the new on line gambling market will be split between central and regional governments and used to ‘encourage sport and for cultural development.’ Along with the tax on stakes, gross revenue on activities wagering will be taxed at around 37.5 percent, while ‘games of chance,’ which include casino gaming, and, apparently, poker, will be somewhere between the 15 to 30 percent mark.

‘To the Detriment of Customers and State’

The RGA claims that current taxation levels will restrict competition in the market ‘to the detriment of Portuguese consumers as well as the income tax revenues that the Portuguese state could take were the marketplace become taxed at a sensible rate of gross video gaming revenue.’ Additionally criticized the actual fact that the Portuguese monopoly operator of offline sports wagering, Santa Casa, are only taxed at half the rate of its online counterparts.

Clive Hawkswood, chief executive officer of this RGA, said: ‘Whilst the RGA and its members welcome the Portuguese initiative in seeking to regulate the internet gambling sector, our people are extremely concerned about the unworkable tax prices that are proposed in the draft legislation which is presently being considered.

‘The extent of this disparity in income tax burden between licensed sports that are online operators plus the offline monopoly operator Santa Casa could be just as much as 50 % and only Santa Casa. Such a differential has the potential to create a predicament of substantial illegal state help being granted to Santa Casa by the Portuguese government whilst additionally destroying any hope for fair competition in the next regulated online sports wagering government.’

Constructive Dialogue Needed

While many lawmakers in Portugal wanted to start to see the introduction of an open market, the current draft gambling bill suggests a jurisdiction similar to those that you can get in countries like France and Italy. International operators is going to be able apply for licenses providing they ‘meet the requirements,’ and ‘are in good financial standing in their finances and social security.’ Nonetheless, companies will also have to be ‘established and registered’ within the nation and can have to offer their services through a domain name that is bot.PT.

Mesquita Nunes refused to be drawn recently on any projections of annual revenue for the new market, saying it’s impractical to know how many operators would apply for Portuguese licenses. The response to that would be ‘not many. with the current proposed taxation figures, argues the RGA’

The RGA says it would welcome the opportunity to engage in a ‘constructive dialogue with all the Portuguese government to ensure a level playing field for several online recreations betting operators seeking to obtain licenses.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *