Jonathan Parke, former head of commissioning at RGT, now director of Sophoro Ltd.
The accountable Gambling Trust (RGT), the UK’s leading problem advocacy that is gambling, has found itself in the harsh glare of the news spotlight again, this time around for allegations of nepotism.
The charity, which will be funded by the bookmaking industry to the tune of $5 million each year to research and promote the prevention of problem gambling, has been under fire in the press that is british for apparent conflicts of great interest. Because of its ties that are close the gambling industry, concerns have been asked as to whether its research is completely independent of gaming passions.
The RGT maintains it is unbiased. But the revelation this week by the UK’s Independent newspaper that a firm owned by the husband regarding the charity’s Director of Commissioning, Jane Rigbye, has been awarded a research that is lucrative, isn’t assisting the cause of credibility for the outfit.
According to the Independent, Sophoro Ltd. owned by Rigbye’s spouse Jonathan Parke, is offered a major research agreement as part of a £750,000 initiative into the aftereffect of online video gaming on issue gambling.
Parke was once mind of commissioning at RGT himself, leading to accusations which he and their wife swapped jobs, then promptly swapped contracts.
Sophoro ended up being granted the contract in December, the firstly two, but until final year the business was registered during the couple’s family home, and both Rigbye and Parke were listed as company directors.
Also, Sophoro bid for the RGT contract just two months after Rigbye stepped down as director to take in her role that is new at.
In response to the news, Labour shadow gambling minister Clive Efford said RGT ‘should be disbanded’ if its research had been found to protect the ‘interests of the industry at the cost of people who have gambling problems.’
Goulden Steps Down
RGT has for ages been accused of being too sympathetic to the industry, and in particular for its refusal to denounce fixed-odds wagering terminals (FOBTs) in bookmaking shops.
Last thirty days, Neil Goulden, the trust’s president, stepped criticism that is down following The Guardian newspaper that while chair of RGT, he was additionally a chair associated with industry lobby group known as the Association of British Bookmakers (ABB). The jobs had been held concurrently between 2012 and mid-2014.
Goulden told the Guardian that his participation with RGT, as well as the participation of the industry as whole, had been integral to investigating and ultimately understanding problem gambling.
‘[Bookmakers] would not have released data or have taken the actions it continues to consume prevention of damage without my individual impact and urging,’ he said.
RGT, which is going to be examined by the charity regulator on the Sophoro affair, told the Independent that Rigbye had no say in commissioning of research contracts.
DraftKings Appeals Ny AG Lawsuit, Filing Says Empire State Must Ban Spelling Bees
New York AG Eric Schneiderman, who has been accused by DraftKings of earning errors in his lawsuit against DFS sites. (Image: pokerhomegames.com)
DraftKings has launched its appeal against the ny State injunction that is preliminary seeks to ban daily dream sports (DFS) and put an end to its operations in the Empire State.
The DFS operator’s 67-page filing pulls no punches, accusing ny Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of appropriate misapprehensions that ‘did perhaps not come close to carrying the burden’ of proof that DFS is not a game of skill.
It further accuses the court of ‘abusing its discernment’ in siding with Schneiderman.
‘The court applied the wrong legal standard, and ignored the undisputed proof, to find that daily fantasy sports contests are games of chance,’ the business argued in its filing.
Is An Entry Fee A bet?
In December, Justice Manuel Mendez granted the AG’s injunction, ordering DraftKings and FanDuel to stop operations in New York State, its market that is second-biggest after.
DraftKings immediately filed a motion that is expedited remain the court’s choice pending the upshot of its appeal. It was upheld by a Court of Appeals judge that same afternoon, permitting the companies to continue business temporarily in New York until the actual situation is remedied.
In his December ruling, Mendez was needed to determine whether DFS had been a game of skill or of chance, and more particularly, whether setting a line-up was a skill-based process with an ‘entry cost,’ or an out-and-out ‘wager.’ He decided it was the latter.
‘New York State law that is penal maybe not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ rather it states that someone, ‘risks something of value,” he stated. ‘The re payment of an ‘entry fee’ since high as $10,600 on one or more competitions daily could certainly be deemed risking ‘something of value.’ ‘
Dog Shows and Bass Fishing
DraftKings’ appeal filing claims that if this were the case, then ‘dog shows and spelling bees, yachting tournaments and bass fishing’ should really be ‘criminalized’ under Judge Mendez’s ruling. Each of these are events entry that is requiring whose outcome is susceptible to an element of opportunity, argues the DraftKings filing.
‘Daily fantasy sports are skill-based games that are, and really should be, legal,’ DraftKings’ lawyer David Boies stated in a statement. ‘DraftKings competitions are believe it or not legal than season-long fantasy sports, that your Attorney General has repeatedly conceded are legal.’
In January, Schneiderman amended his lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel to seek the return of all of the buy-ins compensated by ny residents paid to both businesses throughout 2015, plus a $5,000 fine head that is per.
With 600,000 DFS customers in the state, this would represent hundreds of millions of dollars in buy-ins, plus around $3 billion in fines.
Outrage Over NFL-Owned Children Daily Fantasy Sports Site from Youth Advocacy Group
The NFL kids daily fantasy sports site is facing backlash from several outraged groups, arguing the league really should not be marketing their product to children as young as six yrs . old. (Image: fantasy.nflrush.com)
Directed at pre-teen kids, daily fantasy recreations (DFS) site NFL Rush is being asked to stop operations by the non-profit company Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC).
In a story that might seem appropriate for satire, the fact is that the National Football League is catering to kiddies to take part in free DFS contests, with the potential for winning weekly prizes like an XBOX One, video games, and a grand prize of a $5,000 scholarship.
Based on the NFL Rush Fantasy website, ‘US residents between 6 and 12 who have actually parental consent are eligible.’
Though the league and its commissioner, Roger Goodell, have long publicly opposed recreations betting and gambling, it apparently has no qualms when it comes to children and fantasy sports. The CCFC is calling on Goodell and the NFL to stop marketing fantasy football to children in conjunction with the National Council on Problem Gambling.
‘ There is evidence that playing dream sports, particularly with the motivation of valuable rewards as offered on the NFL Rush Fantasy site and app, can lead to problem gambling and addiction,’ CCFC Executive Director Josh Golin said in their letter to your league. ‘It is unconscionable that the NFL encourages kiddies as young as six years of age to produce the habit of engaging in this adult activity.’
The NFL has always maintained that any expansion of old-fashioned sports betting could negatively impact the league and compromise the integrity of its games. Surprisingly, it is taken a rather different stance on daily fantasy contests.
FanDuel has contracts with 15 NFL teams, while Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots owners Jerry Jones and Robert Kraft hold stakes in DraftKings.
DFS differs from sports wagering due to the very fact that the participant isn’t just picking a team or line, but assembling a roster of players in a procedure that is considered to be an endeavor that is skill-based.
Multiple solicitors general have ruled that DFS constitutes gambling, utilizing the operators themselves, not interestingly, fighting straight back. The data on who routinely wins DFS contests seems to help the skill over luck debate.
But as it pertains to children, teaching 6 to 12-year-olds how exactly to assemble a team of players to give the very best probability of winning a video game console is cause for concern certainly.
‘By providing these valuable incentives, the NFL is indoctrinating kids into engaging in dream activities having a stake that is financial the end result,’ the CCFC noted. ‘This exposes them, and our communities, to the potential risks of gambling issues.’
You have got to Be Carefully Taught
It ought to be noted that the NFL hasn’t just promoted an online website: it’s offered an in-classroom curriculum for teachers as well. Launched in 2014, NFL Rush Fantasy Learn, Play, Score! was billed as a mathematics and language arts course based around fantasy sports. The league says that the program wrapped at the end of 2014-2015 season, however in it, children were encouraged to ‘choose their ultimate fantasy team each week’ through critical reasoning.
This program did employ basic math in determining just how many fantasy points are to be allocated based on the ball player’s performance, 888 casino bonus claim new nonetheless it also required the student to understand the guidelines of football. Critics of the scheme argued it’s the NFL’s way to engage a new audience, as youth football involvement continues to decline.
Hey, have you thought to simply teach the worthiness of a dollar with a ‘Let It Rain’ mathematics program as well?
No Safeguards for Guardians
If you’re thinking NFL Rush features a number of protections to avoid kids from registering by themselves, you are going to be amazed to find out that registrants are simply required to supply their parent’s email address, so that the NFL can verify their guardian and age consent.
Undoubtedly no 10-year-old would think to enter their friend’s email or create a quick Yahoo address to self-confirm their validation, right? Of course perhaps not.
From on the web poker to the emergence of daily dream sports, the primary concern for several legislators is just how to best protect adult consumers while video gaming on the Web, as well as the very dilemma of age verification. However, into the instance involving kids, the most susceptible and impressionable demographic, small is being done to keep your child that is way-under-18-year-old from in daily fantasy activities.
Interestingly, no body from the contingent that is pro-RAWA to have jumped with this site as evidence that children will not be exempt from gambling online. It’s exactly the type or type of fodder that Sheldon Adelson and the bill’s other sponsors, like presidential GOP contender Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida), would love to throw in the face of everyone who supports Internet gaming.