Essay writing on global warming

Global warming is not a prediction. It really is happening right now. This is a current escalation in temperature associated with the Earth `s atmosphere, water, and surface. Human activities produce greenhouse gases that accumulate into the atmosphere and cause problems our planet faces today. Global warming can do more than just melt polar ice and change weather patterns throughout the world.

It can change our maps, displace people from tropical islands and cities, and cause famine. There is absolutely no debate within the clinical community. The clinical evidence of the global warming is clear. The consequences with this global problem will only intensify if we usually do not confront the realities of climate change. Mankind should achieve some meaningful solutions in order to address the threat of global warming. We have to stop deforestations, reduce carbon emissions, and fight misinformation. Men and women should really be prepared for the inevitable consequences of the global warming. It is our today`s reality and we should really be responsible for doing so much harm to our planet Earth.

Teachers often ask their students to write essays on global warming in order to expand their understanding of this serious problem and make them take action as individuals. Below are a few important facts of global warming causes, impacts, and solutions that will help write a persuasive essay.

The facts on global warming you have to know to write a good essay

Very obvious aftereffects of global warming is extreme weather. The weather patterns are rapidly changing in all parts of the world. The increased rainfall in certain regions affects the balance that animals and plants need certainly to survive. Climate changes cause health issues, animal migration, and the lack of food resources. Extreme heat and droughts in diverse elements of our planet are becoming disastrous to human being health. The frequency of the heavy precipitation has lead to the greater prevalence of floods. Global warming creates more natural disasters. Extreme weather events will continue to occur with greater intensity. So, we are going to experience significant changes in seasonal temperatures variations, wind patterns, and annual precipitation.
The effects of global warming on plants and animals are expected to be widespread and profound. Many organisms are migrating from the equator toward poles in order to find more comfortable conditions for their existence. Nonetheless, lot of animals go extinct as they are not able to compete in new climate regime. Global warming could cause the disappearance all the way to one-third of Earth`s animals and one-half of plants by 2080.
The effects of climate change as a result of global warming may be devastating towards the human being society. Men and women can face severe crop failures and livestock shortages that will cause civic unrest, food riots, famines, and political instability into the whole world. Global warming threatens our future health conditions. Humanity will experience an escalation in tick-borne and mosquito-borne diseases. What exactly is more, folks have become more at risk of extreme weather and climate changes that lead to serious mental health issues.
The sea-level rise accelerates 0.12 inches per year in overage all over the world. This trend will continue if gas emissions remain unchecked. People are to blame for rapidly melting ice, warming oceans, and rising sea levels. Coral reefs are in danger while the ocean warms. Two-thirds associated with the Great Barrier Reef was damaged as being a results of climate change. Global warming advances the acidity of seawater because of the increase of the levels of CO2. The ocean is 26 percent more acidic than before the Industrial revolution. Melting glaciers endanger peoples life on the coastal areas. It can cause landslides and other land collapses.
Escalation in average temperatures is the major problem caused by global warming. The average global temperature has increased by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 100 years. 2016 was the hottest year on record worldwide. Such temperatures turn our environment in to a breeding ground for infections and diseases. The worst thing is that increased dryness and greenhouse gases serve as natural fuels for wildfires.
Researchers have predicted the effects for the future based on the climate changes as a result of global warming problem. Snow cover is projected to contract. Sea ice is projected to shrink in both Antarctic and Arctic. Future tropical cyclones will become more intense. Heavy precipitation events, heat waves, and hot extremes will become more frequent. Arctic late-summer sea ice can disappear by the end of the 21st century. Sea level rise and anthropogenic warming will continue for centuries.
Men and women should cut power consumption in order to decrease the aftereffects of global warming. We have to buy less polluting cars, get more efficient refrigeration, and reduce water heating requirements. We have to also fly less or not at all. Such measures will surely influence modern society a lot. Nonetheless, it is important for every person to accomplish anything to prolong life on earth. Just think, there is more skin tightening and into the atmosphere today than at any point in the final 800,000 years.
Air quality is affected greatly by the global warming. The air pollution caused by overabundance of skin tightening and, vehicular emissions, and power plants influences the human respiratory system. A lot of people all over the world suffer with respiratory diseases.
The Earth`s temperature will continue to rise so long as mankind continues to produce greenhouse gases. The outer lining of our planet can warm by 6 degrees this century.

Information that will make your essay more interesting and catching

The Arctic is amongst the worst places afflicted with global warming.
More than 1 million species are becoming extinct as a result of aftereffects of global warming.
The Montana Glacier national Park has only 25 glaciers as opposed to 150 that were truth be told there into the year 1910.
Human activities release around 37 billion metric tons of skin tightening and per year.
With every degree rise in global temperatures, lightning strikes will increase by 12%.
Severe natural disasters caused by global warming have left millions of people impoverished and homeless.
Jungle leaves become less wholesome for the animals that feed to them as they accumulate more fiber and less protein.

Climate change is a disturbing subject that casts a shadow across ordinary life. I recall an encounter by having a woman called Sandra at a community project I was running. As we completed a questionnaire to calculate her individual carbon footprint, she pushed her coffee cup awkwardly away and said: ‘I hate all that advice about ‘Don’t overfill the kettle, turn your thermostat down, unplug your phone charger.’ I make an effort to follow it but, every time I do among those things, it generates me think of climate change and I feel hopeless, upset. So then I don’t bother. Why make yourself feel bad when there isn’t really anything you can do?’ Sandra expressed openly what a lot of people don’t admit — thinking about climate change is upsetting and brings towards the surface a internal conflict about just how to respond.

Ipsos-Mori’s Climate Change survey in 2010 suggested that while most UK citizens remain concerned about climate change, it’s not high on their agenda. Even when people are concerned, this isn’t mirrored by action to reduce carbon emissions. In 2001, Susanne Stoll-Kleeman, professor of applied geography and sustainability science at the Ernst Moritz Arendt University of Greifswald in Germany, conducted interviews with focus groups and found that people tend to rationalise their inaction, creating arguments that blame others, underemphasise the importance of personal action, and overemphasise the cost of shifting from a comfortable lifestyle.

These findings are echoed in research with individuals in community projects, which said things like: ‘I’m not in a position to do much, I don’t earn a lot and we need the car and a nice holiday’; ‘ I don’t do much about climate change, but I’m a member of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and I do my recycling’; ‘I’ve got worse things to be concerned about, thank you very much’; ‘ I don’t think we need stress, technology will sort this down’; ‘I didn’t cause this problem — don’t examine me — talk to the Chinese.’

In dealing with climate change, we have been into the terrain that psychoanalysis calls resistance or defence — the ability to guard ourselves from too much mental and emotional pain. Although each statement carries an element of truth, its primary purpose is protective: a rationalisation for inaction. These are subtler forms of denial than those found among outright climate sceptics or deniers. The reality of climate change is acknowledged but its value is discounted, and the person involved avoids taking any responsibility for the issue. If, nonetheless, you delve behind these kinds of statements, you usually find anxiety, unease and apprehension. Sometimes you discover guilt, sometimes grief, and sometimes a sense of impossible conflict.

Men and women know there is a problem — nevertheless they would rather not know

One explanation for such defensive reactions is that climate change is the form of intractable, vast problem that systems thinkers term ‘wicked’. The urban designers Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber coined this phrase into the 1970s when they were fighting the fact public policy rarely seemed to please every person, often had unintended consequences, and never seemed to solve problems neatly and efficiently. ‘Wicked’ problems are embedded in social complexity: drug trafficking is a good example. They defy easy definition and there is little chance of applying an off-the-peg answer. Every attempt at a solution intervenes into the system and changes the situation. There are many stakeholders, and the problem’s shape, definition and potential solutions look distinctive from each perspective. With ‘wicked’ problems, there are no true-false solutions, only better-worse ones.

Climate change is a ‘wicked’ problem par excellence. Psychology all together and psychoanalysis in particular are not solutions to climate change but they do offer an important thought processes about the problem. They might just assist to shift enough people’s attitudes to give us to be able to tackle climate change itself, from a position of consensus and commitment, rather than of apathy and indecision.

Feeling insignificant: a ship skims through the melting ice of the Ilulissat glacier regarding the western coast of Greenland. Photo by Steen Ulrik Johannessen/afp/Getty

Into the 1990s, several psychologists realised that their discipline had paid insufficient attention to the human being relationship with the natural world, and sought approaches to understand how we would expand the emotional connection between individuals and nature. As Lester Brown, the American environmental analyst which founded the Worldwatch Institute, put it into the introduction to Theodore Roszak’s book Ecopsychology (1995), the goal of this new sub-discipline was to ‘re-examine the human psyche as an important part of the web of nature’. Eco-psychology was inspired by the deep ecology action of the 1970s, and shared that movement’s belief that consumerism and even industrialisation itself could be seen as a new form of pathology, chiefly as evidence of a disturbed relation to nature.

Sign up to our newsletter

Updates on everything new at Aeon.

Daily
Weekly

See our newsletter privacy policy here

At the same time, researchers in cognitive and social psychology begun to examine the fact men and women rarely act relative to their stated environmental attitudes. This more pragmatic approach led to an emphasis on individual behaviour change and the barriers that prevent it, often describing complex webs of elements that might be involved.

What psychoanalysis has contributed to these psychological debates is a fuller understanding of human being subjectivity and, more importantly, an emphasis on the limits of rationality, the centrality of human being vulnerability, and the value in our everyday lives of powerful, conflicting emotions. Men and women know there is a problem — nevertheless they would rather not know. The anxiety that comes with reflecting on climate change might be unbearable, and the guilt it provokes might be crushing. It’s just too painful to accept the reality of it. Difficult knowledge can threaten a person’s sense of identity, put them at odds with their family, undermine their chosen life-path or bring their values into question. Psychoanalysis exposes the capacity of the person mind — long familiar to literature — to learn anything with one area of the self yet not with another, that is, to interpret reality in self-flattering ways, to struggle with conscience, and to avoid uncomfortable truths.

It might feel like too much to be both an excellent mommy and a responsible environmental citizen

Though psychoanalytic thinking is focused on understanding individual experience, additionally help us to see how deeply individual responses are embedded in social practices — a particularly helpful approach when thinking of a shared social challenge such as for example acting on climate change. The way men and women bring up their children, decorate their homes or take holiday breaks are deeply personal but they are also culturally framed and constructed. The impression that one is ‘a good mother’ is embedded in a myriad of assumptions which can be culturally and socially validated, but that might be deleterious towards the environment. Leaving the lights on for an anxious toddler, picking a better school that’s a car-drive away, buying new costumes for a Halloween party, a laptop for homework and an exciting foreign holiday is likely to be prompted by love, care, generosity as well as the need to enjoy family life. Such actions feel utterly normal. They’ve been shared with peers and supported by social assumptions about a good family life. Their carbon emissions are significant but these rarely, if ever, enter the picture. When these usual methods for doing things are questioned, or demands for change are designed, men and women believe that their identity is under danger. More properly, they believe that they truly are being faced with an impossible conflict. It might feel like too much to be both an excellent mommy and a responsible environmental citizen. It’s hardly surprising then that countless of us react with strong emotions, defensive responses, or distress when confronted with the environmental imperative. What might be more surprising is that apathy can spring from just the same anxieties and sense of danger.

Apathy is rarely what it seems. Enjoying people’s stories soon uncovers the underlying reality of complex emotions and un-addressed difficulties. Research conducted by the psychologist Renee Lertzman on the list of residents of Green Bay into the Great Lakes region in Wisconsin, an area which includes slowly been depleted through development and farming, found that beneath a mask of disengagement from environmental issues, local people were actually distressed by the area’s environmental decline. It wasn’t that they didn’t care, rather they cared a lot of. They remained attached to landscapes from the past that were now lost, damaged or polluted, and so they felt helpless as a result. Psychoanalysis would conclude that whenever loss remains un-mourned and grief unarticulated, the reparative impulses cannot be mobilised and people are unlikely to act.

Conversations from my personal community-based activities and workshops on climate change in the UK confirm that there is a whole array of experience behind the stereotypes of denial. Some years ago, I ran a project in which we attended public events and invited individuals to have their carbon footprints calculated. A rather defiant young man sat down aided by the opening remark ‘ I don’t rely on any of this you know’. As our conversation progressed, I said to him: ‘Just suppose that you did believe climate change was real — what would you do?’ He thought for a moment, then slapped his hands on his knees, laughed and said: ‘Top myself’. As Freud argued, jokes certainly are a way of allowing an unspeakable or unacceptable truth into consciousness. That man’s apparently flippant remark revealed that climate change might make him start thinking about suicide . What he said caused a stunned silence between us and, before I could offer any further comment, he got up and left, muttering that he had to meet his girlfriend before vanishing into the crowds

The training from psychotherapy is that unexpressed emotions and experiences find their way out anyway — as symptoms

In a longer, quieter conversation with a young woman called Emma we teased out the place of identity in her attachment to a lifestyle of foreign holiday breaks, shopping and weekends spent clubbing. She joked that she experienced a turnover in shoes that rivalled that of Imelda Marcos, rumoured to own 3,000 pairs. Shopping was Emma’s treatment for moments of depression and meaninglessness: shoes were her ‘pick-me-up’. She would momentarily feel confident and centred as she headed for home with a designer purchase. She told me how, as being a teenager, she and her friends had joked: ‘One pair of organic, handwoven, ethical socks? Or 10 pairs of extra-value, child-labour, throwaways — yeay! Select the exploitation model!’ The defensive reaction was a way of coping with the awareness of the darker side of industrialised consumerism plus the countervailing need to remain area of the peer group.

Delve deeper into people’s life stories and experiences also it becomes clear why lists such as ‘Top 10 tips for a cleaner planet’ are frequently dropped straight into the bin. Simplistic demands for changes in behaviour take no account of the complexity of people’s feelings about climate change or the way in which behaviour is locked into social structures and expectations. Cheerful reminders of exactly what do be done are as more likely to trigger a defensive response as an impulse to act. Individuals who have been made ‘Green Champions’ at the job report being mocked and ignored. ‘They draw cartoons on my posters,’ reported one.

An older woman explained how the lists of good advice from the power saving Trust irritated her. ‘It just doesn’t fit with how I live my as you like it scene by scene summary life,’ she said. She liked to leave all the lights on as it made the house feel welcoming. To fill the kettle towards the top in case somebody else wanted a cup of tea. To heat the whole house (though she lived alone) and to keep carefully the fridge well-stocked in case her children or visitors dropped in. These patterns were deeply connected to her sense of herself as being a mommy, a home-maker and a large friend, and protected her from the pain of her single status and her loneliness since her young ones had left home. The information leaflet didn’t remain the opportunity.

There is a long British tradition of avoiding difficult emotions. A generation ago this was finished with the ‘stiff upper lip’. Today, avoidance is more likely to be achieved by minimising the significance of bad news and looking regarding the bright side. The recognition that people may be frightened by stories of catastrophe often leads climate change communicators to focus on the uplifting as well as the optimistic, promoting a few ideas such as for example ‘small steps’, ‘every action counts’ and other types of painless transition. Sadly, such approaches will probably create confusion into the public mind. When there is no connection involving the increasingly bleak news from climate researchers and the scale of actions people are urged to take, the turmoil of feeling produced by the news is left to churn away, unattended. The training from psychotherapy is that unexpressed emotions and experiences find their way out anyway — as symptoms. They cannot just disappear: they emerge as defiance, denial, anxiety, depression and indifference.

For example, the urge to go shopping can function both as being a denial that everything is wrong so when a ‘painkiller’ drug that comforts and protects against uncomfortable knowledge. ‘Sometimes, I’d just say: sod it — why shouldn’t I? Everyone else is doing it,’ said Emma. ‘i am aware I don’t absolutely need the stuff, and a short while later I feel bad about it. But at the time, it helps.’ Emma recognised she was being defiant and that there was clearly anything addictive in her relationship to ‘stuff’, but each trip to the shopping centre temporarily soothed her, effortlessly masking any underlying sense of futility about climate change.

So what can make a difference to how we feel and speak about climate change? The existence of a ‘safe space’ where feelings may be explored, dilemmas examined and people’s creativity engaged is critical. We truly need environments in which we can face loss, tolerate anxiety, re-frame identity, and re-negotiate social relationships. climate change short essay Only then can the dark shadow that climate change casts be lifted. In therapy, it will be the therapist which supplies this safe space, through the provision of a regular time and destination, and through personal attributes such as for example warmth and compassion, attention and encouragement. As the therapist just isn’t afraid of difficult emotion and may tolerate the patient’s confusion, aggression and pain, these difficult psychological states may be expressed, worked through and left out. It becomes possible to bear the truth and face reality. Creativity re-emerges.

An essential task for men and women working on climate change is always to think of how this safe space may be provided for the public as a whole. This space is more than a metaphor. We need to think of policy and communication with an eye to align the truth about climate change as well as the dependence on emotional security.

Into the public sphere, this safe space can exist figuratively, through leadership and the way in which public figures speak about the issues. The language that frames them, the stories which can be told, and the metaphors which can be used are all essential. Telling the truth without producing unbearable anxiety is a difficult act but, when done well, it really is certainly effective, as anyone who is familiar with the speeches of Winston Churchill will know. Following a defeat of the British Expeditionary Force in France, on 4 June 1940, he gave what is now known as the ‘We Shall Fight regarding the Beaches’ speech. It was Churchill’s truth-telling about the scale of the defeat, accompanied by a refusal to blame, that allowed him to argue with conviction that the British men and women remained able to face and over come the crisis before them. Whatever one thinks of Churchill as being a politician, his psychological sure-footedness will probably be worth studying.

At a community level, a safe space may be offered by projects that acknowledge complexity of feeling and work out room for people to talk. Creating community forums that feel personal, supportive, participatory and respectful can be as important as installing a solar panel in getting real action on climate change. An example of here is the national project that brings men and women together in facilitated small groups to discuss their responses to climate change and make reductions in their carbon footprints. Conversations about loss, grief, anxiety, ambivalence and identity weave their way around practical considerations of just how to reduce one’s impact regarding the world. The combination of truthfulness, support and challenge are key.

At an individual level, a safe space may be offered by anyone with the courage to initiate an arduous conversation by having a friend. All that is needed is a quiet moment, a genuine curiosity about the other person, and the capacity to respect and support someone else in exploring the dilemmas that all of us face in relation to climate change.